The tester appreciates the powerful vacuuming and mopping of hard floors, which works simultaneously and leaves them quickly dry. They also mention the practical self-cleaning function. As a drawback, they note that the device doesn't reach corners and edges ideally.

The reviewer rates the cleaning performance as effective but points out several drawbacks. They describe the self-cleaning cycle as noisy. The voice assistant volume cannot be adjusted and it talks constantly. The device is heavier than competitors and requires force to open. The need for frequent hair cleaning from the dirty water tank is described as an unpleasant chore.

The Australian reviewer appreciates the cleaning performance and motorized wheels that make handling easier. Among the drawbacks, they list the very long charging time – 4 hours is accurate according to them. They describe the noise level in fast self-cleaning mode as a significant factor to consider. The loudness is a real concern in their opinion.

The tester noticed a problem with the battery – during self-cleaning on the docking station, the battery dropped by another 10 percent. They assume that the energy needed to complete the cleaning consumes more than the device receives from the charger. Otherwise, they appreciate the ease of setup and cleaning performance.

The reviewer warns about a safety risk – when paused during cleaning with the handle set vertically, the device drove itself across the kitchen due to the motorized wheels. They recommend always turning off the device before folding the handle, especially near stairs. They also criticize the excessive reliance on the app and the high price.

Among positive ratings, negative experiences also appear. Some users report defective units after just one month of use – it stopped vacuuming and was leaking water. Others report clicking wheels right after unboxing. There are complaints about customer service and problems with self-cleaning that leaves water on the floor.